Items lacking a box shot

Catalogue audit · 1,681 active SKUs · 2026-06-15

838

lack a box shot

No packaging image on file. A box image for these needs a reference photo from Jessar (or they get no box image).

843

already have a box shot

Mostly Xtricity / lighting — the existing 3D box renders. A box image can be produced/cleaned from these without new input.

The 838, by line × type

Brand · product type	SKUs	share
JS Gourmet · Kitchen	412
JS Gourmet · Bath / laundry / household	108
JS Maison · Décor / mats	70
Xtricity · Bulbs	49
Jessar Lighting · Desk lamps	33
Jessar Industries · Kitchen	30
Jessar Industries · Extension cords	15
JS Gourmet · Hooks / org · Furniture · Baskets · Textiles	48
Other (Xtricity boxes/security/power · misc)	73

↓ Download full 838-row list (CSV)

SKU · title · brand · type · current image count

What this means for the box-image quote

Quote 1 priced a box image for all 1,681 SKUs (assume-all-boxed). This audit splits that line: ~843 already have a box reference (the 3D renders) we can work from directly, and ~838 need a box photo from Jessar before we can produce one. The bulk of the gap is the kitchen / home lines (JS Gourmet + JS Maison) — the electrical/lighting side is largely covered by existing box renders.

Recommendation: ask Jessar for box photos on the high-value lines first — start with the ~40 hero items and the appliances/cookware, not all 838 at once. For long-tail kitchen with no box and low priority, a clean product shot alone is fine. The CSV is sorted by brand → type so it's easy to hand Jessar a targeted "please photograph these boxes" pull.

Method & confidence: classified by detecting packaging images (3D box renders + box/packaging filenames) across every product's image set; spot-checked kitchen multi-image items to confirm their extra shots are alternate product angles, not boxes. A box photo saved under a generic filename could be a rare miss — but the sampled kitchen items confirm the pattern holds. Source: work/lacking_box_shot.csv